States of HIV Fragility: Capacity, Vulnerabilities, and Epidemic Evolution in Mozambique
Report
Erling Høg
April
2008
- Topic(s) of work
- Fragile States
Geographic Location
Mozambique★ SSRC Sponsored Research
Abstract
The main purpose of this article is to qualify HIV/AIDS in relation to state fragility in
Mozambique, based on fieldwork and literature review to contextualize it within other
African countries facing the HIV epidemic. This is pursued by an analysis of epidemic
evolution, ethnography of treatment access and delivery, HIV fragility, and absorptive
capacity. First, Mozambique is considered a ‘stable low-income country’, which provides an
environment of ‘easy partnership’. It is not a ‘fragile state’ as defined in development
discourse. Second, the most fragile states benefit the least from international support. Third,
the weak Mozambican public health system and the political avoidance of private health care
point to particular forms of fragility. Many die of HIV related diseases due to the fragile
public health system with limited absorptive capacity. The article concludes that the question
of how the epidemic aggravates already weak states is conspicuously absent from measure-
ment of state fragility now more than 25 years since its inception. This is particularly
unfortunate in Mozambique, a low-income country with exceptional partnerships and
progress in antiretroviral treatment (ART) expansion, yet only treating 16 percent of people
in need of antiretrovirals (ARVs) by the end of 2006. Mozambique experiences crowded
health services, excess illness and deaths in some age groups, large numbers of orphans, loss
of active labour force, and thus an unprecedented human resource crisis. Health and disease
pertain both to national and social welfare, an argument reinforced by the unfolding HIV
epidemic that affects all levels of society. The question remains when Mozambique will move
from 'weak' and 'fragile' to 'strong', independent of foreign health care support. The article
finally recommends measuring state fragility ‘with and without AIDS’ in order to properly
understand its impact and to take appropriate action. The ‘states of HIV fragility correlation’
is a starting point towards this endeavour.